Active lawsuits
Current cases our legal team is reviewing
Harmed by a drug, a medical device, a product or a company's negligence? These are the lawsuits Legal Rights Now is reviewing now. Each page explains what the lawsuits allege, who may be eligible, what to gather and where the litigation stands, with links to the court records.
Allegations in a lawsuit are not findings by a court. A multidistrict litigation (MDL) groups similar individual lawsuits before one federal judge for pretrial work; it isn't a class action. Last reviewed October 12, 2026.
These cases, by the numbers
- 12active lawsuits our legal team is reviewing
- 14federal MDL dockets behind them
- 6kinds of harm, from dangerous drugs to social media
- 171MDLs pending in federal court in all, on the same report
All 14 MDL dockets behind these lawsuits are listed as pending on the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's Pending MDL Dockets by MDL Type, report date October 1, 2026 (opens in a new tab). The total of 171 is from the JPML's MDL Statistics Report for the same date (see pending MDLs (opens in a new tab)).
Dangerous drugs
Prescription medicines that lawsuits allege caused serious injuries, or carried risks the makers did not adequately disclose.
MDL No. 3094 and No. 3163
GLP-1 medication lawsuits
Lawsuits allege GLP-1 medicines can cause gastroparesis, other serious stomach and bowel injuries, and the eye condition NAION.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Learn more and see if you’re eligibleMDL No. 3140
Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuits
Lawsuits allege long-term use of the Depo-Provera birth control shot can increase the risk of meningioma, a type of brain tumor.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida (Pensacola Division)
Learn more and see if you’re eligibleMDL No. 3092
Suboxone film tooth decay lawsuits
Lawsuits allege Suboxone sublingual film causes tooth decay and dental erosion and that the makers failed to warn.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Learn more and see if you’re eligibleMDL No. 3180
Dupixent lymphoma lawsuits
Lawsuits allege the eczema medicine Dupixent caused or accelerated cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
Learn more and see if you’re eligible
Defective medical devices
Implanted medical devices that lawsuits allege failed, broke or caused injury.
MDL No. 3081 and No. 3125
Implanted port catheter lawsuits
Lawsuits allege some implanted port catheters break down and cause infection, fracture, migration and blood clots.
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona and the Southern District of California
Learn more and see if you’re eligibleMDL No. 2974
Paragard IUD breakage lawsuits
Lawsuits allege the Paragard copper IUD can break during removal, leaving pieces that may need surgery to remove.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Learn more and see if you’re eligible
Consumer products
Everyday products that lawsuits allege caused illness or injury.
Toxic & chemical exposure
Illness that lawsuits link to harmful chemicals used at work or found in drinking water.
Sexual assault and exploitation
Survivors of sexual assault by rideshare drivers, and children sexually exploited by adults who contacted them through an online game.
MDL No. 3084
Uber passenger sexual assault lawsuits
Lawsuits allege Uber failed to protect passengers from sexual assault and harassment by drivers.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Learn more and see if you’re eligibleMDL No. 3171
Lyft passenger sexual assault lawsuits
Lawsuits allege Lyft knew of the risk of sexual assault by drivers and failed to protect passengers.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Learn more and see if you’re eligibleMDL No. 3166
Roblox child sexual exploitation lawsuits
Lawsuits allege predators used Roblox to target and groom children, and that the companies failed to protect young users.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Learn more and see if you’re eligible
How these cases arise
Product and corporate liability lawsuits, including the mass torts grouped into MDLs, usually rest on one or more of these claims. Here is where each one comes up in the lawsuits we're reviewing.
Manufacturing defects
Something went wrong in how a product, or a batch, was made, so it isn't what the maker intended.
- Implanted port cathetersCatheters alleged to be made with too much barium sulfate, which weakens the material
Design defects
The product is unreasonably dangerous because of how it was designed, even when it's made correctly.
- Suboxone filmAlleged to be designed to be acidic, which plaintiffs say damages teeth
- Paragard IUDAlleged to have a propensity to break when it is removed
- Social media harmPlatforms alleged to be designed to maximize screen time
- Roblox child exploitationClaims include design defect, alongside negligence and failure to warn
Insufficient warnings or instructions
The label, instructions or warnings didn't adequately explain a risk the maker knew or should have known about.
- GLP-1 medicationsMakers alleged not to have adequately warned patients or doctors
- Depo-ProveraAlleged failure to warn about meningioma
- DupixentAlleged failure to provide adequate warnings about CTCL
- Hair relaxersCompanies alleged not to have warned about reproductive harms
- Suboxone filmMakers alleged to have known about, but not warned of, damage to teeth
Environmental and corporate negligence
A company didn't use reasonable care, such as by releasing harmful chemicals or ignoring a known safety problem, and people were hurt as a result.
- AFFF firefighting foamPFAS from firefighting foam alleged to have contaminated drinking water
- Uber sexual assaultAlleged failure to adopt appropriate safety precautions for riders
- Lyft sexual assaultAlleged failure to screen, train and supervise drivers
- Roblox child exploitationAlleged failure to protect children from predators on the platform
Based on the allegations described in the court records linked from each lawsuit page. The rules for these claims come mainly from state law.
What to expect from your free case evaluation
Whichever lawsuit brought you here, the first step is the same: a short form, read by our own legal team.
- Our attorneys and legal team review it. Your request stays with Legal Rights Now and is kept confidential.
- We contact you. We use the contact details you give us to talk through your situation and any records we may need.
- We tell you what we see. That includes when a claim may not be a good fit.
- You decide what to do next. The evaluation is free, and there's no obligation. We represent a client only after we both sign a written agreement.
- Deadlines still apply. Asking for an evaluation doesn't file a claim or pause any deadline, so include the dates you know.
Not sure which lawsuit fits?
Tell us what happened in a few sentences. Our legal team will review it and contact you about your free case evaluation, even if your situation isn't listed here.
a few sentences is enough
Submitting the form doesn't create an attorney-client relationship, file a claim or pause any deadline.
a few sentences is enough
Social media and youth mental health
Lawsuits alleging that social media platforms were designed in ways that harm young users.
MDL No. 3047
Social media addiction lawsuits
Lawsuits allege Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube were designed to encourage addictive use by young people, leading to depression, anxiety and other harms.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Oakland)
Learn more and see if you’re eligible