Active lawsuitDangerous drugsMDL No. 3140

Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuits

Depo-Provera is an injectable contraceptive, given as a shot every few months, that the FDA approved in 1992. Women across the country have filed lawsuits alleging that long-term use of Depo-Provera, or a generic version, can increase the risk of meningioma, a type of brain tumor, and that the makers did not adequately warn about it. Our legal team reviews these cases. If you received Depo-Provera and were diagnosed with a meningioma, you can ask for a free case evaluation.

Last reviewed October 12, 2026 · Sources: federal court records, JPML, DailyMed, FDA

the pharmacy label has the dates

A woman reading a letter at her kitchen table, with a mug and a bowl of fruit in front of her

This page summarizes what pending lawsuits allege, based on court records and official sources. Allegations in a lawsuit are not findings by a court. It's general information, not legal advice about your situation. Last reviewed October 12, 2026.

On this page

Safety note: Don't stop or change your birth control without talking to your health care provider.

At a glance

Depo-Provera Brain Tumor (Meningioma) Lawsuits

Litigation
In re: Depo-Provera (Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate) Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 3140
Court
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola Division
Judge
Judge M. Casey Rodgers
Centralized
February 7, 2025
Companies named
Pfizer Inc., Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. LLC and Pharmacia LLC; Greenstone LLC and Viatris Inc.; and Prasco, LLC, which has distributed the authorized generic since November 2020

What the lawsuits allege

  • Meningioma. Plaintiffs allege that recent scientific studies show long-term use of Depo-Provera can increase the risk of developing one or more meningiomas, tumors that grow from the membranes around the brain and spinal cord. The MDL is limited to people who allege an intracranial meningioma caused by Depo-Provera or a generic version.
  • Warnings. The lawsuits allege the makers knew or should have known of the risk and failed to adequately warn patients and doctors.
  • Safer alternative. Plaintiffs also allege the makers failed to promote Depo-SubQ Provera 104, which plaintiffs contend is safer because it uses a lower dose given under the skin.

According to the court, the defendants maintain that the medication is safe and effective. An MDL means many people have filed similar lawsuits. It does not mean any court has decided that Depo-Provera caused anyone's tumor.

Who may be eligible

You may be eligible for a free case evaluation if you received Depo-Provera injections, or a generic version, and were diagnosed with an intracranial meningioma.

Our attorneys look at

  • When you received injections and for how long
  • Whether you received brand-name Depo-Provera or a generic version
  • When and how your meningioma was diagnosed, and the treatment you needed, such as monitoring, surgery or radiation

What to gather for your free evaluation

You don't need everything on this list to ask for an evaluation. Gather what you can.

  • Records of your injections: clinic, doctor's office or pharmacy records with dates
  • The names of the providers who gave the injections
  • The MRI or CT report that found the meningioma, and the date of diagnosis
  • Records from your neurologist or neurosurgeon, including any surgery or pathology report
  • Records of radiation or other treatment
  • A short timeline of your symptoms, such as headaches, vision changes or seizures
  • Records of missed work or other effects on your daily life

Where the litigation stands

As of October 2026

  • LitigationMDL No. 3140
  • CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida (Pensacola Division)
  • JudgeJudge M. Casey Rodgers
  • CreatedFebruary 7, 2025

As of October 2026, lawsuits allege that long-term use of Depo-Provera, or a generic version, can increase the risk of meningioma and that the makers failed to adequately warn about that risk. The MDL is pending before Judge M. Casey Rodgers in the Northern District of Florida.

In a June 15, 2026 order, the court noted an agreement between plaintiffs' leadership counsel and the Pfizer defendants under which plaintiffs who meet eligibility criteria agreed by those parties will have an opportunity to resolve their claims. The court said that agreement, once finalized, will not resolve every case in the MDL, and it continued proceedings on the parties' expert evidence. The court lists a case management conference for December 18, 2026.

What regulators have said

The FDA-approved prescribing information for Depo-Provera CI was revised in December 2025 to add a Warnings and Precautions section on meningioma.

Status checked October 12, 2026. This MDL is listed as pending on the JPML report of pending MDLs dated October 1, 2026 (opens in a new tab). Court dockets change; each page shows the date it was last checked.

Questions

I got the shot from a generic brand. Does that matter?

It can. The MDL includes claims involving Depo-Provera and generic versions of it, but federal law treats brand-name and generic medicines differently in some lawsuits. Tell us what you know about the product you received, and our attorneys will review it.

My meningioma wasn't cancer. Can I still ask for an evaluation?

Yes. Most meningiomas are not cancerous, and the lawsuits concern meningiomas in general. What matters is your diagnosis and history, which our attorneys review.

Is this a class action?

No. In an MDL, each person keeps an individual lawsuit. The cases are grouped before one federal judge for pretrial work.

Is there a deadline?

Yes. Each state sets its own filing deadline, called a statute of limitations, and an MDL does not pause it. The deadline that applies depends on your state and when you learned of your diagnosis, so it's best to ask early.

More questions in the FAQ

Official sources

Each link opens the original record in a new tab.

Received Depo-Provera and were diagnosed with a meningioma?

Tell us what happened in a few sentences. Our legal team reviews every request, and we will contact you about your free case evaluation.

a few sentences is enough

A free case evaluation does not create an attorney-client relationship, does not file a claim and does not pause any deadline. We represent a client only after we both sign a written agreement.

a few sentences is enough