Active lawsuitSocial media and youth mental healthMDL No. 3047
Social media addiction lawsuits
Families across the country have filed lawsuits alleging that the biggest social media platforms were designed to keep young people scrolling, and that compulsive use led to depression, anxiety and other serious harm. These federal cases have been centralized before one judge since 2022. Our legal team reviews these cases. If you or your child started using these platforms as a minor and later struggled with your mental health, you can ask for a free case evaluation.
note roughly when the use began
This page summarizes what pending lawsuits allege, based on court records and official sources. Allegations in a lawsuit are not findings by a court. It's general information, not legal advice about your situation. Last reviewed October 12, 2026.
On this page
Support note: If you or someone you know is in crisis or thinking about suicide, call or text 988 to reach the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline, or call 911 in an emergency.
At a glance
Social Media Addiction and Youth Mental Health Lawsuits
- Litigation
- In re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 3047
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Oakland
- Judge
- Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
- Centralized
- October 6, 2022
- Companies named
- Meta Platforms, Inc. and Instagram LLC (Facebook and Instagram); Snap Inc. (Snapchat); TikTok Inc. and ByteDance Inc.; YouTube LLC, Google LLC and Alphabet Inc.
What the lawsuits allege
- Addictive design. Plaintiffs allege the platforms are defective because they are designed to maximize screen time, which can encourage addictive behavior in adolescents.
- Harm to young users. Personal injury plaintiffs allege that compulsive use as minors led to serious mental health illness, including depression and anxiety, and to other emotional and physical harms. Some families have brought claims on behalf of a child who died.
- Other plaintiffs. The MDL also includes lawsuits brought by school districts and by state attorneys general.
An MDL means many people have filed similar lawsuits. It does not mean any court has decided that these platforms caused anyone's injury.
Who may be eligible
You may be eligible for a free case evaluation if you, or your child, used Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, TikTok or YouTube as a minor, developed compulsive use, and were diagnosed with depression, anxiety or another serious mental health condition.
Parents and guardians can ask on behalf of a child. If your child died and you believe social media use played a part, you can also ask for a free case evaluation.
Our attorneys look at
- Which platforms were used, and at what age use began
- How use changed over time, and its effect on sleep, school and daily life
- Diagnoses and treatment, such as counseling, medication or hospital care
What to gather for your free evaluation
You don't need everything on this list to ask for an evaluation. Gather what you can.
- A list of the platforms and accounts used, and roughly when each started
- Screen-time reports from the phone or app, if available
- Records from doctors, therapists, counselors or hospitals
- School records that show changes, such as attendance or grades, if relevant
- A short timeline of when problems began and the care received
Don't delete accounts before talking with us; account history can matter.
Where the litigation stands
As of October 2026
- LitigationMDL No. 3047
- CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Oakland)
- JudgeChief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
- CreatedOctober 6, 2022
As of October 2026, lawsuits allege that social media platforms are defectively designed to maximize screen time in ways that can encourage addictive behavior in adolescents, resulting in emotional and physical harms that include depression, anxiety and, in some cases, death. The MDL, which also includes cases brought by school districts and state attorneys general, is pending before Chief Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in the Northern District of California, who held a further case management conference on October 9, 2026.
What public health officials have said
In May 2023, the U.S. Surgeon General issued an advisory on social media and youth mental health, which said that we cannot conclude social media is sufficiently safe for children and adolescents.
Status checked October 12, 2026. This MDL is listed as pending on the JPML report of pending MDLs dated October 1, 2026 (opens in a new tab). Court dockets change; each page shows the date it was last checked.
Questions
Official sources
Each link opens the original record in a new tab.
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaU.S. District Court, N.D. Cal.: In re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation, 4:22-md-03047-YGRcand.uscourts.gov (opens in a new tab)
- Judicial Panel on Multidistrict LitigationJPML Transfer Order, MDL No. 3047 (filed Feb. 1, 2023), describing the MDL's allegationsjpml.uscourts.gov (opens in a new tab)
- U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesU.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Social Media and Youth Mental Health (Surgeon General's Advisory, 2023)hhs.gov (opens in a new tab)
Did social media use as a minor lead to serious mental health struggles?
Tell us what happened in a few sentences. Our legal team reviews every request, and we will contact you about your free case evaluation.
a few sentences is enough
A free case evaluation does not create an attorney-client relationship, does not file a claim and does not pause any deadline. We represent a client only after we both sign a written agreement.
a few sentences is enough